雅思口語part2的開頭第一句應該怎麼講?如何引出話題?
用的最多的是Speaking of something,但其實用什麼都無所謂,考官聽的是整個答案,而不是開頭這一句
雅思口語part2開場怎麼說
用引言開頭
用來開頭的引言,可以是名人說過的話,也可以是自己熟悉的人說過的話。一位考生在描述“your future plan”時,用馬克吐溫的一句話來開場:
Mark Twain once said: “Predictions are very difficult to make—especially when they involve the future.”
而另一位考生在描述“an animal”這個話題時,同樣運用了引言。與之前那位考生不同的是,他引用的是他叔叔說過的話:
“It is a moment I will always cherish, I was at the mouth of the Minjiang River, when I saw a Chinese crested tern—one of the rarest birds on Earth. I was so excited I could barely keep my binoculars from shaking.” These words come from my uncle, a member of the Fujian Bird Watching Society.
用故事開頭
一位考生在講到一次令人難忘的經曆時,講述了四川大地震這一慘痛的經曆。在此之前,他用了一個小故事作為開頭,自然而貼切:
Lin Hao was only 9 years old when the Sichuan earthquake struck Yingxiu Township. He was in school with 30 other students, but only 10 escaped from the building. Risking his own life, Lin Hao went back to the rubble and pulled two of his classmates to safety.
但是值得注意的是,用故事開頭一定要簡短,切忌不能太長,否則會造成本末倒置。
雅思口語part2部分要講大概多少句呢?我隻講了四句長句哦。中間還要想來想去的。這樣大概多少分啊。
part2是給你兩分鍾的時間描述考官給你的話題,至少要說一分半。這一個話題中一共會給你四到五個小問題,每個問題大約說四到五句就差不多夠時間了。如果你沒有說夠時間的話大約也就5分左右,也可能會更低。千萬不要在part2空白太長時間,不然分數不會高。
求雅思part2幾篇範文
1.Should criminals be sent to a jail or let them do something else as punishment instead of sending into a jail? Why and give your reasons.
There has long been controversy concerning the objectives of the justice system. Sending criminals to a prison seems to be a justified punishment for damages inflicted to victims or society. But currently an increasing number of people goes with the option that criminals should be given appropriate amount of community services as a substitute of correction measures.
Traditionally courts sentence law violators to serve a period of time in a prison or, under some circumstances, a correction institution if the offenders are minors or the charges are not serious. Criminals, after serving their time, are discharged back to the street. Ironically many of them end up becoming victims of the law itself. For example, a forty years old man served 10 years in prison for intentional injury. Released from jail, he found himself having great trouble in making a living because he lacked new skills and knowledge for work. No place wanted him for fear of possible future wrongdoings because of his criminal record. In many cases, ex-criminals become outcasts of community and are forced to commit other crimes for revenge or other reasons.
On the contrary, criminals could be changed into contributing members of the society again if given a second chance. In such cases, they perform public services under supervision making a meager but honest living. This not only cuts the expenses of keeping them in jails such as food, cloth, and numerous other costs, but also warns would-be law offenders the consequences for illegal actions. This is particularly effective for minor criminals who stand a greater chance of achieving the corrective aims.
But it is no easy job to draw a fine line between those who should be given a lighter punishment and those who should be more heavily published due the nature of law under complex circumstances. Nevertheless, we should encourage more effective ways of law enforcement to protect law-abiding citizens and, at the same time, deter and punish violators at any level so that criminals would not take advantage of lighter punishments.
To sum up, either sending criminals to a prison or giving them community work as another form of punishment has merits for different reasons. But we need to be clear of the goals of law and choose more effective ways of law enforcement.
2這篇跟要求內容基本一樣,稍作參考吧
Some people think that university should not provide theoretical knowledge, but to give practical training benefit to society. Do you agree or disagree? Use your own experience and knowledge to support your idea.
Nowhere in the world has the issue of student been so much debated as in our society. In this competitive society, ability of work and employment experience have become very important features of ordinary students’ future; therefore, many people think that university should teach students the real knowledge that comes from practice and direct experience. The above point is certainly wrong; this essay will outline three reasons.
The main reason is that students’ study will be delayed and disadvantaged. The academic knowledge of students will be hard to make greater progress in order to practical training and employment experience. In this special period of life, students have the best memory and intellect. If they do not work hard at study, they will lose it that could be balanced by neither good employment experience nor information of outside classroom. If students choose to carefully study academic knowledge in the university, they would gain a better future.
Another reason is that current knowledge of students is not enough capable to face practical training’s requirements. If students are not taught professional theoretical knowledge, they just depend on the basal academic knowledge that they studied in the high school. In fact, they are really difficult to progress real practical training and gain abundant employment experience.
Last but not the least reason is the professional theoretical knowledge that it is necessary to work of future. For instance, when I graduated from university, I did not have any employment experience. But, I was hired a famous network company. I could gain this work chance, only, because of my professional theoretical knowledge.
In conclusion, the students ought to only study theoretical knowledge in the university. It is unnecessary to let university that provides plenty of practical training.
3.Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution. What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think more effective?
Bad traffic and increasing pollution are thorny issues challenging every major city in the globe. To combat such problems, government encourages companies to mark up gas price in an effort to decrease car use and cut down waste gas. However it may temporarily alleviate the problem, but is doubtfully the optimal solution.
First of all, consumers and economy would be victimized by such measures. The number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of the population affluent enough to own cars. As a result, raises in gas price could invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not drastically change their behavior in using cars. Even if the number of cars on road is reduced due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve traffic problems. Such policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs on current and prospect car owners, and undermine the economy of a nation. In the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads and more effective use of available transport facilities.
Secondly, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading cause of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances into the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacturing industry. As a result, reduction of the number of cars would not return us a blue sky and fresh air. We could better handle this problem if we could increase control over industrial waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and production equipment.
Finally, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner energy resources could also be a better solution. For example, we now have the ability to make cell-powered or even solar-powered cars. Such energy is completely clean and plentiful. However we still have a very long way to go to turn such technologically possible into affordable and practical products.
To conclude, it is not the best way to control traffic and pollution by increasing gas price because such action will hurt consumers and economy without achieving what it is aimed for. Measures such as construction of better transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be more effective solutions.
4.#
5.It is generally believed that education is of vital importance in individuals’ development and well-being of societies. What should education consist of to fulfill both these functions?
With the rapid development of modern society, education is becoming more and more crucial to both individuals and societies. The issue over what education should consist of has considerably aroused people’s wide concern. In this essay, I seek to explore this complicated topic from diverse perspectives and what influence could be brought.
Among the most important aspects education should consist of, one should be stressed is professional knowledge education. On one hand, under the fierce competitive circumstance, people who have professional skills and experience attract many big companies. Therefore, study about one special area gives people more opportunities to hurt an ideal job. On the other hand, this education is also significant to develop societies in a long run.
At the second place, what is also worth noticing is that physical education is necessary for students, especially for teenagers. If you want to achieve successfully in the modern societies, strong body is the first premise, which makes you always in sharp. So education should push people to take care themselves and this could bring great benefits to the healthy society.
Last but not least, we should not lose sight of psychological education. Psychological problems are serious nowadays and a sizable percentage of people suffer from them. A survey conducted by a famous research organization indicates that over 40 percent of students have various psychological problems, who really need help from school and society. Even worse, if such problems cannot be solved, they could hamper the progress of well-being society.
Judging from what I have been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that three aspects cannot be separated in education, which play vital important roles in the growth of individuals and societies. The fulfillment of both people and societies can be done as long as we lay emphasis on three aspects mentioned above.
英語雅思口語part2要講一到兩分鍾,大概是多少詞左右?
p2題目不是通常問 what who when where how Why 等等這種疑問詞開頭的問題嗎?根據題目描述的主題不同通常會有其中四個疑問詞相關的問題,每個問題的描述至少至少兩到三句話,還是要長的那種,怕時間還不夠的話一個疑問詞至少四到五句話。一句話十秒左右,你要是還算流利沒有問非所答,該答的點答到了,沒有特別明顯的語法錯誤,6分還是可以的
雅思口語part2卡片能看著說嗎
說是一張卡,其實現在大多數考場裏都是寫在一張紙上的。
考試的時候考官會讓你看那張卡,時間大約1分鍾。考官在把卡給你之後開始計時,他說停的時候你必須放下卡,開始回答part2。當part2結束時,考官會要求:could you please give the card back to me?這時,你就可以把卡還給他了。
關於雅思口語part2時間
我拿7分那次是自己在一分鍾內講完
因為這樣才可以確保像作文一樣有開頭,主體和最後的總結。
等考官打斷的話太被動了
在你即將講完的時候,最好有一個明顯的句子告訴考官你已經講完了。例如,IN OTHER WORD, I BELIEVE THAT...(不要用THAT IS ALL)。這樣的話考官就知道你講完,轉入PART3了。
如果是PART2的話大概100-130字就OK了。語速不要太快也不要太慢(有點廢話,嗬嗬)。語速的標準是以你講得清楚為準。隻要你講準詞,發音完整,其實慢一點也沒有關係的。我的話大概1分鍾100字左右。
雅思口語PART2就說了兩三句能得幾分
其實這要看你當時臨場的反應能力,我記得當時給我主考的一個英國人就隻是給我閑談,問了幾個特別簡單的問題,但是我就把這個問題當實用性問題回答。他當時問:Do you like the walls in your home decorated with what? 我當時比較無語,然後我就說I like Van Gogh's painting, so I find some of his paintings on the wall. He is the image to send, Monet's paintings are also very good, sunset painting is his classic. My friends like to hang the clock on the wall, I feel drawn directly on the wall paintings that feel better, the clock should not be as decoration.之類的,這樣不但會給考官一個好印象,而且還能得高分。
雅思口語part2總共多少話題
一.主場話題可“大串”
首先,“大串”指備考雅思的同學要準備一個主場話題。主場話題指你個人最擅長的一個話題,最喜歡說的一個話題。相對而言,也是英文表達方法儲備得比較詳盡的一個話題。
比如有同學喜歡籃球,籃球相關表達:三分、跳投、罰籃這些概念的英文說法一定要會,籃球就可能成為你雅思口語的主場話題。2015年雅思考試就考過描述一個有用的網站(describe a useful website you often visit),同學就可以說籃球網站;或者描述一個教育性的電視節目,說一個籃球課的節目也可以;再比如明星,我可以在籃球的這個範圍內找一個體育明星。
所以帶著這樣一個思路可以發現雅思口語很多part2的話題卡都可以串起來。50張左右的話題卡可以串起成為你的主場。主場話題,可以是興趣愛好,比如有同學自詡吃貨,那食材、烹飪方法的相關描述就需要準備詳盡。還有同學喜歡旅遊、時尚、電子競技等等,都可以。
但提醒同學們在雅思口語考試中盡量不要用自己的專業作為主場話題,因為part1中可能問到專業,提到這一問題後,part2相關問題再重複說,可能並不會取得一個特別好的效果。
二.共用語材可“小串”
雅思口語話題那麼多,同學們會發現總有主場話題涵蓋不了的,這時候我們可以嚐試共用語材,即“小串”。“小串”即非主場可以彼此串聯。
2015年雅思口語考題中有一道描述一次迷路的經曆,還有一道讓你描述想再來一次的短途旅行,還有一張卡是讓你描述一個驚喜。其實,看到這幾張卡的時候,未必考慮把它全都串到主場裏,甚至有些話題,可能串到我的主場裏麵會非常牽強。但他們彼此之間可以關聯。
比如,短途旅行中可能迷路,迷路後可能走到一個非常美的地方,見到美麗的景色,這又成為一個驚喜。麵對這樣的驚喜你希望再做一次短途旅行。這樣三張卡,準備一個素材就夠了。
三.大小串外需打補丁
麵對個別話題,“大串”和“小串”都拚不到一起,這樣的雅思口語題目需要“打補丁”。通常補丁話題的數量應該不會超過10個。
雅思口語PART2隻說了一分鍾不到
第三部分問的問題多是個好兆頭
有可能是6分的
我當時第二部分說的有點快 自我感覺時間不夠 說完了自己還在那愣呢
考官看了下時間 然後開始第三部分 我當時嚇死了
但是結果出來6 總分6.5
所以時間方麵不會特別苛刻 耐心等成績吧
轉載請注明出處句子大全網 » 雅思口語part2的開頭第一句應該怎